Ready for Lent?
The history of Septuagesima With Septuagesima Sunday, we begin to prepare for the Holy Triduum and the celebration of Easter. This was the last liturgical season to be added to the calendar, dating from around the time of Pope St. Gregory the Great (590-604), in whose sacramentary we find the texts of the Masses for the three Sundays of this season, respectively named Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima—meaning literal ly, the seventieth, sixtieth and fiftieth days before Easter. These are round numbers since in fact, Septuagesima Sunday occurs 63 days before Easter; Sexagesima, 56 days prior; and Quinquages ima, 49 days prior. The first Sunday of Lent is itself called Quadragesima, meaning fortieth, although it falls 42 days before Easter.
The reasons for this pre-Lenten season are both historical and symbolic. The symbolism, as the name Septuagesima suggests, is that this period of roughly 70 days’ preparation for Easter corresponds to the 70 years that the Jewish people spent in captivity in Babylon, waiting for their deliverance so that they could return to Jerusalem and the Promised Land. Here, the Jewish race represents the whole of mankind held captive to sin, exiled from the Promised Land of heaven, and prey to all the miseries of the present life.
The historical reason for a pre-Lenten season is tied to the observance of the Lenten fast, which over the course of history.
LITURGY was anticipated in different ways to ensure, as much as possible, that the total number of fast days would be exactly forty, despite the non-observance of Sundays and, in the case of the Eastern Church, of Saturdays.
Various ways of observing the Lenten fast from the earliest times, the Church has fasted in prepar ation for Easter, the greatest feast of the liturgical calendar and the first to be celebrated on a fixed date. The fast was of approximately forty days, in imitation of the fast that our Lord undertook before beginning his public ministry. Christ our Lord fasted for forty days prior to giving us the New Law, just as Moses fasted for forty days before giving us the Old Law. Accordingly, the Church Fathers interpreted the number forty as symbolic of penance and of fidelity to God’s commandments.
At first, the number forty was observed only approximately. Until the close of the fifth century, the Lenten fast began on the Monday following the First Sunday of Lent. Pope St. Gregory the Great alludes to this in one of his homilies: “There are,” he says, “from this day (the first Sunday of Lent) to the joyous feast of Easter, six weeks, that is, forty-two days. As we do not fast on the six Sundays, there are but thirty-six fasting days, which we offer to God as the tithe of our year.”
Soon afterward, the fast was extended backward to Ash Wednesday in order to bring the period of fasting to a full forty days. This became of obligation in the whole Latin Church as early as the ninth century.
For the Greeks, meanwhile, Saturday was a sacred day on which they could not fast. Subtracting Saturday and Sunday from the six weeks of Lent, they fell ten days short of the full forty days’ fast. To compensate, the Greeks extended their fast back two weeks prior to the first Sunday of Lent, namely, to Sexagesima Sunday. In the meantime, religious monks and nuns undertook to fast even earlier, so as to always be some what more mortified than people of the world. Peter of Blois writes in the 12th century: “All Religious begin the Fast of Lent at Septuagesima; the Greeks, at Sexagesima; the Clergy, at Quinquagesima; and the rest of Christians, who form the Church militant on earth, begin their Lent on the Wednesday follow ing Quinquagesima.” (Sermon xiii). Dom Gueranger assures us, however, that in the 15th century this usage had become obsolete, so that all the Latins, monks and clergy included, began their fast on Ash Wednesday together with the rest of the faithful.
Suppression of the Alleluia While there is no longer any fasting during the pre-Lenten season of Septuagesima prior to Ash Wednesday, the penitential character of the Septuagesima season is made evident by the use of violet vestments, the removal of flowers from the altar, and the suppression of the organ, of the angelic hymn Gloria in exclesis Deo and of the Alleluia. Dom Gueranger remarks:
“Even as early as the beginning of the 9th century, as we learn from Amalarius, the Alleluia and Gloria in excelsis were suspended in the Septuagesima Offices…Finally, in the second half of the 11th century, Pope Alexander the Second enacted, that the total suspension of the Alleluia should be everywhere observed, beginning with the Vespers of the Saturday preceding Septuagesima Sunday.” The liturgist Pius Parsch explains, “The expression [Alle luia] comes from the Hebrew Hallelu-Yah and means ‘Praise Yahweh (God).’ But even in the Old Testament it had already lost its literal meaning and had become a cry of joy. In the Book of Tobias we read, ‘In the streets (of the heavenly Jerusalem) Alleluia is sung’ (Tob. 13:22). In this sense the first Christians received the word and used it as a song of joy, of heaven, and of resurrection.”
As Septuagesima marks the beginning of the Church’s preparation for the Sacred Triduum, and this preparation requires that we forget for a time about the joys of our Lord’s Resurrection in order to do penance for our sins and compassionate our Lord in his sufferings, the suppression of the Alleluia is particularly severe, admitting of no exceptions from beginning to end. Durandus, a medieval liturgist, writes, “We desist from saying Alleluia, the song chanted by angels, because we have been excluded from the company of the angels on account of Adam’s sin. In the Babylon of our earthly life, we sit by the streams, weeping as we remember Sion. For as the children of Israel in an alien land hung their harps upon the willows, so we too must forget the Alleluia song in the season of sadness, of penance, and bitter ness of heart (Ps. 136).”
This is part of the hidden beauty of Septuagesima: a season that we should try to enter into with our whole heart and make our own. It is a tragic beauty, bitter-sweet. “Ought not Christ to have suffered these things and so, to enter into his glory?” (Luke 24:26) The same condition applies to us, the members of the Mystical Body, as to its Head, Christ. We, too, must suffer with Christ and for Christ if we wish to obtain a participation in his glory.